<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Multivariate testing to improve Firefox conversion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.giantspatula.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.giantspatula.com/?p=5</link>
	<description>a Rolnitzky blog &#62; thoughts about Mozilla marketing and some other stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 06:32:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A More Dynamic Experience &#124; Giant Spatula</title>
		<link>http://www.giantspatula.com/?p=5&#038;cpage=1#comment-2013</link>
		<dc:creator>A More Dynamic Experience &#124; Giant Spatula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 19:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giantspatula.com/?p=5#comment-2013</guid>
		<description>[...] we&#8217;ll be doing fairly straight-forward A/B testing.  I&#8217;ve written about this type of website optimization before,  but the basic mechanics of this test are to run different versions of the download page [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we&#8217;ll be doing fairly straight-forward A/B testing.  I&#8217;ve written about this type of website optimization before,  but the basic mechanics of this test are to run different versions of the download page [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vipin</title>
		<link>http://www.giantspatula.com/?p=5&#038;cpage=1#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>vipin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giantspatula.com/?p=5#comment-94</guid>
		<description>The 3rd page is very good. But the original Download Firefox button is the best. The page could have included more awards received by Firefox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 3rd page is very good. But the original Download Firefox button is the best. The page could have included more awards received by Firefox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A more effective Firefox download page &#124; Giant Spatula &#62; a Rolnitzky blog</title>
		<link>http://www.giantspatula.com/?p=5&#038;cpage=1#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>A more effective Firefox download page &#124; Giant Spatula &#62; a Rolnitzky blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giantspatula.com/?p=5#comment-49</guid>
		<description>[...] we&#8217;ve been testing some variations of the US Firefox download page. You can read about the details in-depth here, but our goal was pretty basic &#8212; increase the download conversion rate (individuals that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we&#8217;ve been testing some variations of the US Firefox download page. You can read about the details in-depth here, but our goal was pretty basic &#8212; increase the download conversion rate (individuals that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas (Lendo)</title>
		<link>http://www.giantspatula.com/?p=5&#038;cpage=1#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas (Lendo)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 13:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.giantspatula.com/?p=5#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I love the simpleness of the first Test Page but the  second Test Page looks more serious/respectable and informative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I love the simpleness of the first Test Page but the  second Test Page looks more serious/respectable and informative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
