In a previous post, I wrote about the details of a test we were going to conduct on the Firefox download page. To recap, the goals of the test were two-fold: improve the visit-to-download conversion rate, and provide a better user experience for site visitors by displaying relevant information about Firefox based on their browser type. We’ve done A/B testing before to try and improve metrics like conversion rate, but this is the first time we’ve incorporated browser detection into the mix in order to display more relevant information to Firefox.com visitors.
Making Converts
Most users that visit the Firefox download page that don’t have Firefox arrive with Internet Explorer. Since IE makes up the majority of visits, we created a page specifically addressing IE users, with information about Firefox vs. IE features, reasons to switch, and of course a prominent download button. The end result was that over the week-long test period, the test page improved visit-to-download conversion by 0.3% over the incumbent page at a statistically significant level (for you stats geeks out there, that’s at a 99% Confidence Level where z=~4). To put this in perspective, for the en-US page specifically, that type of improvement would net about a quarter of a million new downloads per year. More testing is on the way to try and continue to improve this result. In the meantime, if you visit the Firefox download page and you have Internet Explorer in the US, you’ll get this new “control” page.
Content Just For You, Awesome Firefox User
One of the key insights prior to this test was the discovery that a huge percentage of users that already have Firefox (about 30%!) end up on the Firefox download page. From looking at some anonymous click-stream data in conjunction with funnelcake experiments, a large number of these users seem to be confused about how to update their Firefox. Once again, browser detection to the rescue (or so the theory of the test goes)!
So we presented two more test pages for users that visited with Firefox–one for those with the latest flavor of version 3, and a page for those that visited with a version older than 3. The first page (we’ll refer to it as the “Upgrade” page), focused on encouraging users to upgrade and prominently featuring tips and tricks. The second page (we’ll refer to it as the “Get Personal” page), encouraged users with the latest and greatest version of Firefox (good job!) to explore the world of browser customization and get involved with the Mozilla community.
To measure how well these two pages performed against our current page (our well known Firefox download page, a.k.a. the “control”), we used bounce-rate, defined as single page views/entry pages as our main metric. In other words, compared to the control page, did users see one of these new test pages and indicate an interest in learning more by clicking on links for customization, tips and tricks, or by upgrading their browser? Or did they see the page, and with an unsatisfied feeling, “bounce” away somewhere else on the web?
It turns out that presenting visitors with relevant content actually seems to work! The bounce rate for the Upgrade Page bested the control by 4% (the lower the number for bounce rate, the better) and for the personalize page by 18%. In other words, people were more likely to find the information they were looking for with one of the test pages vs. our old friend, the control page.
Since the test concluded, we’ve implemented these test pages (“Upgrade” and “Get Personal”) for the en-US locale. And we’re already incorporating these pages into the plans for Firefox 3.5 launch based on the findings of this test. So look for even more relevant content on Mozilla.com in the future.
There are a lot of differences between the two pages: color/background, size of the download box, presence of awards, presence of “switching tips”, and positive vs IE-antagonistic text. There could even be speed differences. Wouldn’t it be better to test all those changes independently, so you know which ones actually help?
Great point Jesse. We’re looking at multi-variate capabilities that will allow us to do tests exactly in the way you describe but in a scalable way. In the short-term, we’ll continue to do this type of A-B testing.
From an international perspective, I could see that phrases like “So 2006″ are great for the US and Canada, but for non-native-language folks ending up there and not on the tailored landing pages, it might be an idiom too far out of what folks learn (or not) in school, and thus confusing.
Which is a looooong sentence and possibly the question, do we have the data to see how those experiments worked across languages?
A thought about the IE page:
The link “Make the switch today!” is a bit ambiguous.
Something like “See more reasons to switch here!” is a better description and helps the user decide what to do next.
@ Axel – good question. Since this was a first test done in en-US, we don’t have data for other languages. While some of the copy may not be a perfect fit for translation, there are some good lessons that can be applied from a structural and contextual perspective (e.g., “switch” content, adding more info about customization, making “tips and tricks” content more prominent, etc.).
[...] different set of content to existing Firefox users seems intuitive, right? Based on David’s findings, visitors to the test pages agreed. The download conversion rate of IE visitors increased [...]
[...] 市场和度量团队最近在努力提升Firefox下载页面的用户使用体验并希望能够提升访问/下载比率。在实验和测试了不同的设计之后,他们在en-US语言版本的页面中对浏览器进行检测,这样会根据用户是否使用Firefox、使用什么版本的Firefox等因素来提供不同的内容。“现在看来提供给访问者不同的内容是可行的!”Ken Kovash 和 David Rolnitzky最近都在博客中讨论了这个想法。 [...]
[...] Results: As a result of this data-driven design, bounce rates to these key pages improved between 4% and 18%, and download conversion (the number of people that landed on the page that downloaded Firefox) improved. Creating dynamic content based on browser type is now implemented permanently on the Mozilla.com website. Read more here. [...]